TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Developer's guide From:"Jeanne A. E. DeVoto" <jaed -at- JAEDWORKS -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:34:50 -0700
At 4:44 PM -0700 7/14/99, :--) wrote:
>[...] One of the most interesting benefits, however,
>in using sans-serif fonts I witnessed was while I was consulting with a
>small but extremely successful financial investment company in Utah.
>[letter set in Times New Roman changed to Arial]
>Surprisingly, all (yes, all) thought the second letter was an entirely
>different letter-and that the first one was "difficult to read"!
Not surprising at all; Times (in all its variations) *is* a
difficult-to-read face. It wasn't designed for readability in a
full-page-width letter format and certainly doesn't achieve it.
But does this say something about serif versus sans-serif fonts, or about a
relatively open face versus a narrow one, or does it simply say "Don't
choose a hard-to-read font face if you want a document read"?