TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:SUMMARY: Use of disabled From:Chris Hamilton <caxdj -at- EARTHLINK -dot- NET> Date:Wed, 21 Jul 1999 10:09:11 -0400
Thank you all for responding on this. The votes are in and the majority
of you don't see a problem with the use of the word "disabled." I
thought not, but I am often tone-deaf on such issues.
Here's the rundown:
11 don't think there's an issue
1 didn't seem upset but suggested an alternative
1 said that disable might not be a problem, but disabled might
1 was highly offended that I mentioned dying on a hill because his
Great Aunt Nellie once died on a hill for noble reasons that are beyond
reproach. I feel your pain. I'm gonna die someday, too, and that offends
me a great deal. I will, however, do my best to not die on a hill.
Finally, one person suggested that I might check with a group such as
the BC Coalition for People with Disabilities or the Neil Squire
caxdj -at- earthlink -dot- net