TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I have a 2000-page SGML doc set. I have decided discontinue this format
a) I need a special server software to convert to HTML for web serving
b) SGML editors are expensive, not practical corporate solution
So I'm converting the lot to HTML, which I'll then publish via HTTP, or on
CD. So far so good, using Word macros (though if anyone has any Dynatext
conversion utilities, I'd like to hear from them -- I'm having to recreate
the links to graphics by hand).
I need to enable everyone to edit the HTML pages, once they are created.
Netscape Communicator or Word are good because we already have the
licences. I was pleasantly amazed to discover that if you load a
well-formed HTML file in Word 97, then edit, Word hardly messes it up at
all (as compared to Word's .doc -> .htm export), apart from the following:
* on certain style tags (e.g. address) it applies inline formating (others
it leaves alone)
* its behaviour with ASCII values >127 is erratic.
* doesn't seem to retrieve CSS data
* redefines table widths pixel values to percentages
It would be brilliant if I could let people edit HTML with Word and still
have clean HTML. I'm looking at building a template (but then would have to
distribute it...) with macros to correct the above problems, but does
anyone have any other ideas or had any similar experiences? Is there some
detailed documentation about how Word 97 treats HTML files?