Re: ADMIN: More on upcoming list changes--READ ME

["Parker, Cassandra M." <CMPARKER -at- INTERMEDIA -dot- COM>]

I agree with Eric Olive below, a $5 subscription fee is reasonable because
many of us are already members of other organizations.

Thanks,
^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^

> ----------
> From:         Olive, Eric[SMTP:EOlive -at- GLHEC -dot- ORG]
> Sent:         Tuesday, August 03, 1999 4:55 PM
> To:   TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject:      Re: ADMIN: More on upcoming list changes--READ ME
>
> A $5 subscription fee seems reasonable to me.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jo Baer [SMTP:jbaer -at- MAILBOX1 -dot- TCFBANK -dot- COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 3:53 PM
> > To:   TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> > Subject:      Re: ADMIN: More on upcoming list changes--READ ME
> >
> > I would absolutely be willing to pay a measly five bucks. One good tip
> > is worth five bucks. So is a good laugh. In fact, put me down for ten.
> >
> > Dick Margulis wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > If half the current listmembers were willing to pay $5.00 per year, that
> > would generate $10,000, which ought to be enough to cover the overhead
> > of handling the transactions online as well as the overhead charges you
> > describe.
> >
>
>
> From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=
> =
>
>
>

 From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=