TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Creativity and Single Sourcing From:MAGGIE SECARA <SECARAM -at- mainsaver -dot- com> To:"'Cheryle W'" <cjwiese -at- hotmail -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 27 Oct 1999 10:41:15 -0700
What I'm seeing in all this is the equation of "creativity" to fiddling with
and that's hardly the issue. As someone just said. Shakespeare wrote rather
well within the very strict constraints of a sonnet form. Was he being
soberly technical and therefore non-creative?
Creativity in our profession isn't about whimsical margin setting any more
than it's about painting a mountain. It's about how we approach the subject
matter and the task of communicating it. It's about figuring out how the
damn thing works from an incomplete spec and a half-functioning prototype,
and an engineer whose native tongue is not your own.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cheryle W [SMTP:cjwiese -at- hotmail -dot- com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 4:21 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: RE: Creativity and Single Sourcing
> Maggie wrote:
> <snip>"I really don't want to get in this. But Sean, are you equating
> creativity with Art? And saying that only Art requires or permits
> I suppose it depends on what "creativity" means. The Dilberty buzzword du
> jour for this is "thinking outside the box" (which makes me think people
> use this cliche' are doing exactly the opposite). :)))