TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: XMetaL, Epic or ??? From:"Jessica N. Lange" <jlange -at- OEE -dot- com> To:"TechWR-L" <TECHWR-L -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:51:15 -0500
Tom Johnson wrote in response to Stephanie's query:
>This issue of providing online documents for review has come up before
along with the concept of engineers and programmers wanting to mark up
>If your managers want to standardize across the board, why not go with
Word? Everbody knows it and everybody (just about) has it.
I frequently send Word documents to engineers & other
for electronic review. I protect the document & track for
changes, so I can see what they've cut & what they've
added when they send the revised doc back to me.
Works like a charm.
>FrameMaker has a pretty good utility (FrameViewer) that allows others to
view FrameMaker documents.
Microsoft also provides a free Word Viewer, but the doc cannot
(PS, I'm not trying to inflame the Frame vs Word debate,
just relating what works for me.)
Jessica N. Lange mailto:jlange -at- oee -dot- com
Technical Communicator, Ohio Electronic Engravers, Inc.