RE: Farewell to List or Misty-Eyed Regrets

Subject: RE: Farewell to List or Misty-Eyed Regrets
From: jwaddell <jwaddell -at- micron -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:40:05 -0700

Farewell to Mr. Wing:

I have only one regret. As a new list member, I feel that Mr. Wing has cast
his pearls to the swine too late. If only he would have been here to tell
me about that two spaces after a period thing, or how much better Word is
than FrameMaker, I could have spent my time so much wiser. I guess that I
should be happy in the thought that I was able to see one of his postings.
I'm going to print it off and save it in my cube next the open space where
one day, if I have the charm and grace, I might be able to hang my Wing
Award that I will receive when I grow up and get a real job.

John Waddell
Micron Technology
jwaddell -at- micron -dot- com




-----Original Message-----
From: Wing, Michael J [mailto:mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 12:38 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Farewell to List (and answers to questions that have forever
plag ued Techwriting)


All;

I have recently graduated from technical writing to pre-sales (where I will
be building pilot projects for our internet-based mapping products). It is
a time in my career to go "front line". Technical Writing has been a fine
career, but I have always had much more interest in the technical rather
than the writing. Actually, I could never get into those retentive
arguments that many writers are so found of (fonts, caption placements,
spaces after periods, and so forth). To me, it's like arguing over the
color of the car without ever examining the engine.

I've been an active list member for almost 5 years. Some topics grabbed my
attention and participation (arguments on certification, online vs. print,
industry trends, and so forth). Most topics target a niche audience (such
as putting links in PDFs) or solicit troubleshooting guidelines for tools
(how can I get Robohelp to ...). Occasionally, the topics are downright
ridiculous (see the awards, below).

In parting I would like to do two things: 1) answer those questions that
have plagued writers since chisel was first put to stone and 2) hand out
some personal awards.

Answers to Questions:

1) Two spaces after a period.
2) MSWord over FrameMaker - for it's online flexibility (does anyone still
produce those tree-killing printed manuals?)
3) We should be called ..... Technical Writers ..... not Information
Developers, nor Technical Communicators, nor Secretaries
4) Technical Writers will never be valued at the same level as Engineers,
Scientists, and Programmers. Industry views those professionals as having
'hard' skills, whereas, Technical Writers are viewed as having 'soft'
skills. Hard skill jobs directly develop the ideas that create sellable
products. All other jobs support them. Whining will not change this
perception.
5) Is technical writing a profession, a science, or what? Answer: It's a
craft. Much like cabinet making. Everyone knows how to use a saw and a
hammer, but few have the craftsmanship to make a dinette. Likewise,
everyone thinks that they can write, but few have the craftsmanship to write
clear, concise, and complete material.
6) Just say NO to certification.
7) Should a writer be more technical or more of a writer? Answer, both.
They are not mutually exclusive skills. Though it is my opinion that it is
easier to teach a technical person to write than it is to teach a writer to
be technical.

Awards (tongue-in-cheek):

* Best Topic (for arguments) - Should Technical Writers be certified?
* Best Topic (information) - What is XML?

* Most Inane topic - A tie between "should I have an empty chair in my
office' and "What cartoon character would make a good mascot for Technical
Writers'

* TechWR-L person I'd most like to meet to take to dinner (my treat) -
Arlen Walker
* TechWR-L person I'd most like to meet in order to dump dinner over
his head - Tim Altom
* Favorite person to argue with - Documania (haven't seen a post from
her in a while, though)

* Some of the TechWR-L people whose posts I'll read automatically
(regardless of topic): Arlen Walker, Mark Baker, Jane Goodman, Elna Thymes,
Michael Uhl, and David Castro

* TechWR-L people whose posts make me wince (initials only): JDH, MI,
BS, and AM

Take care,

Michael Wing



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sponsored by Weisner Associates Inc., Online Information Services
Moving your documentation online? We can help with standards, planning,
or training. Visit us at http://www.weisner.com or mailto:info -at- weisner -dot- com -dot-

Sponsored by Scriptorium Publishing. We offer highly effective FrameMaker
and WebWorks Publisher training, consulting, and implementation.
Visit us on the web at www.scriptorium.com


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: jwaddell -at- micron -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.




Previous by Author: RE: Insert Watermark in a Master page in Frame
Next by Author: Online helo for Web sites
Previous by Thread: RE: Why is working from a spec like walking on water?
Next by Thread: Tabbed dialogs


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads