TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: the word "few" From:John Wilcox <jwilcox -at- tcsi -dot- com> To:Techwr-l List <TECHWR-L -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 12 Nov 1999 13:18:29 -0800
John Wilcox wrote:
> A friend sent me a picture of a Hearts game he had just played. He
> noted that he "ran a few hands" to win. I shot back, "Aha!" (See, we
> always edit one another.) "You said 'a few' but you only ran it
> twice!" He contended that "few" means two or more. I checked two
> dictionaries, both of which, to my surprise, concurred with him, that
> few means an indeterminate small number, but at least two. But I also
> noted that I'd never seen or heard it used to mean only two, always
> three or more. I concluded, "So you have authority on your side, but
> I have consensus on mine." Now he has issued a challenge: he wants to
> hear a real consensus. So, how do YOU use the word? Does it mean at
> least two or at least three? Have you ever seen or heard it used to
> mean three?
> Please answer off-list, and I'll report the summary. Thank you! And
> hey, this guy's not even a tech writer or editor, "just" a software
> tester! So our honor is at stake!
The votes are in. The people have spoken. Which means, of course, that
we don't have a definitive answer.:-) But at least we have a lot bigger
majority than in any political election.
40 people voted for the "at least 3" category. 6 people voted for "at
least 2." (*One vote in each column came from the same person, who uses
few for 3 in technical situations, but 2 personally. This person works
at a large software house in Redmond, too. Hmmm.) (And then there was
the one responder who took unkindly to me using the bandwidth for such a
purpose but apparently thought it was OK to use it for flaming. I
apologize to that person for having taken up a nanosecond of his CPU
time and 1 Kb of temporary disk space.)
Here's a monkey wrench: Suppose we have a stadium. It's packed with
50,000 fans. If it is reported that "a few people were being rowdy,"
it's probably not 2 or 3, but more like a hundred, n'est-ce pas? So
maybe the answer is "it's all relative."
Threads like this and the PB&J exercise sure bring out the differences
among us TWs (and people in general).
John Wilcox -- Senior Technical Writer
TCSI Corp. -- Bothell, WA 425-487-8594