Re: Resumes/Interviewing

Subject: Re: Resumes/Interviewing
From: Kimberly <JKWilson -at- concentric -dot- net>
To: <TECHWR-L -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 01:20:31 -0500

>Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 01:18:16 -0500
>To: "Lydia Wong" <lydiaw -at- fpoint -dot- com>
>From: Kimberly <JKWilson -at- concentric -dot- net>
>Subject: Re: Resumes/Interviewing
>
>Lydia makes a good point: different formats are used for permanent
applicants and contractor applicants. I am very aware of that difference,
and my 3-pg, list-laden, table-of-tools resume is strictly for contracting
positions. I would modify this format a bit, delete or de-emphasize the
tools table, concentrate more on the "timeline" approach that Lydia
suggests, for a permanent position.
>
>Kimberly in Atlanta GA
>
>>One big exception to this is if you're a consultant/contractor. Then your
>>suggested arrangement, Nea, makes a lot more sense to me, because a simple
>>"time-line" approach becomes too complicated.
>>
>>Just my 0.02!
>>
>>Lydia
>>------------------
>>Lydia Wong
>>Technical Writer
>>FarPoint Technologies, Inc.
>>www.fpoint.com
>




Previous by Author: Re: Resumes/Interviewing
Next by Author: RE: Resumes/Interviewing
Previous by Thread: Re: Resumes/Interviewing
Next by Thread: RE: Resumes/Interviewing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads