RE: References (was Re: Agencies

Subject: RE: References (was Re: Agencies
From: "Giordano, Connie" <Connie -dot- Giordano -at- FMR -dot- COM>
To: "'Kevin McLauchlan'" <KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 18:03:00 -0500

Kevin,

Maintain your reference network. Christmas and Hanukkah cards, an occasional
"hey it's been too long" phone call or lunch, and the like.

And whether you can use a current colleague depends on your circumstances.
It's a risk, but, for example if you're downsizing, everybody knows who's
leaving and it's not a problem, or if your spouse is being relocated, then
you're leaving without burning any bridges. I did use current colleague
references once when the company was being re-organized into a living hell,
but I took a major chance in trusting those sources.

My 2 1/2 cents

Connie Giordano
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin McLauchlan [mailto:KMcLauchlan -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 3:48 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: References (was Re: Agencies


Ok, maybe it's a dumb question, but it occurred to me while I was
watching the "Agencies" thread go by. How about "permanent"
full-time employees and employment references?





Previous by Author: RE: Where do 'old' techwriters go to die? - is graduate school an answer?
Next by Author: RE: Business team or the Development team?
Previous by Thread: References (was Re: Agencies
Next by Thread: RE: References (was Re: Agencies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads