RE: to be versus ing

Subject: RE: to be versus ing
From: Lief Erickson <lerickson -at- mqsoftware -dot- com>
To: "'Brierley, Sean'" <Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 11:09:27 -0600

The first one. But I might change it to: The tables...

Reason: It is a complete sentence. The second one isn't.
Reason for dropping or changing "software": What other kind do your users
have? Or be more specific about what kind of software.

Good luck! And thanks for all of your posts to Techwr-L and Framers. I
certainly enjoy them.

-Lief Erickson
IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries
Sr. Technical Writer
MQSoftware, Inc.
lerickson -at- mqsoftware -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: Brierley, Sean [mailto:Sean -at- Quodata -dot- Com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 11:00 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: to be versus ing


Okay guys, any preference and why:

"Software tables may need to be manually updated."

"Software tables that may need manual updating."

Thanks for the thought.

Sean
sean -at- quodata -dot- com




Previous by Author: RE: What department are you in?
Next by Author: FrameMaker+SGML
Previous by Thread: to be versus ing
Next by Thread: Re: to be versus ing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads