RE: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word

Subject: RE: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word
From: "David Knopf" <david -at- knopf -dot- com>
To: "Darren Barefoot" <dbarefoot -at- mpsbc -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:28:09 -0800

Darren Barefoot wrote:

| The reality is, if you want to generate a number of digital output formats
| (HTML, HTMLHelp, WinHelp, PDF, etc.), FrameMaker is not a viable
| alternative. DB.

Sorry, but this is nonsense. We create WinHelp, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and
standard HTML direct from FrameMaker on a regular basis. We do it with
WebWorks Publisher from Quadralay, and with very good results, I might add.

Regards,

David Knopf
Knopf Online
Tel: 415.550.8367
E-mail: mailto:david -at- knopf -dot- com
Web: http://www.knopf.com

Certified RoboHELP Instructor & Consultant
WebWorks Publisher Certified Trainer






Previous by Author: ANNOUNCE: Macro Magic II
Next by Author: RE: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word
Previous by Thread: RE: The Old Argument: FrameMaker vs. MS Word
Next by Thread: FW: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads