TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Need another word for "enterable" From:Jo Baer <jbaer -at- mailbox1 -dot- tcfbank -dot- com> To:Bill Hartzer <BHartzer -at- cha-systems -dot- com> Date:Tue, 28 Mar 2000 16:38:32 -0600
Unprotected? (Our programmers use protected and unprotected to
distinguish between fields that can be updated by keying and those that
You might want to reword it--something like "All fields that can be
updated must have a white background." (I tend to avoid "should"--it
sounds wishy-washy to me.)
Bill Hartzer wrote:
> I need some help. A techy SME type insists that "enterable"
> is an acceptable term for use in technical documentation.
> I'd like to use something else, but can't come up with anything.
> Here's an example:
> All enterable fields should have a white background.
> Is there a better way of saying this?
> We're documenting software programming standards.