RE: Master/Slave

Subject: RE: Master/Slave
From: Emru Townsend <etownsen -at- Softimage -dot- com>
To: "'techwrl'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:22:24 -0400

There's a tendency to lump "political correctness" as a monolithic entity,
where all of its practitioners think the same way and want the same things.
Accordingly, there's also a tendency to dehumanize the people behind the
sentiments. Let me add a personal element to this discussion.

Every time I open a manual and I see a reference to a master/slave
relationship, I feel a strange little twinge. I can't explain it, but it's
there. The thing is, I'm not one of those people who's easily set off by
"offensive" terms. I'm not even offended by it (or at least not in the
sense that many people think of when they discuss sensitive terminology). I
preach observing context and intent all the time. But something about that
term just makes me feel funny. When I'm writing, I use an alternate term if
it's possible to do so and remain clear. When it's not possible, I stick
with "master/slave." It's not that hard.

What people see as political correctness is really just a matter of thinking
about your audience. If you can avoid making people feel that discomfort
_and_ get your meaning across clearly, then why not?

Emru Townsend, Information Developer | etownsen -at- softimage -dot- com
Softimage, Inc.
Personal page: http://purpleplanetmedia.com
Recent musings: http://purpleplanetmedia.com/eye/film/u-571.html




Previous by Author: RE: Word/Weird: inconsistency?
Next by Author: RE: Online Courseware: Need URLs
Previous by Thread: RE: Master/Slave
Next by Thread: Re: Master/Slave


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads