RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?

Subject: RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
From: "Halter, Meg" <HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:14:13 -0700


Ahem. I should explain that I'm in California and I was spoofing
semi-literate valley-speak that is so common around here. Really. I should
have put a smiley at the end of the sentence.

-- Meg

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Halter, Meg [SMTP:HalterMC -at- navair -dot- navy -dot- mil]
>
> That's, like, you know, like, so totally true.
>
> -- Meg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Amram Hakohen [SMTP:amramh -at- dnrc -dot- bell-labs -dot- com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 1:55 AM
> > To: TECHWR-L
> > Cc: TECHWR-L
> > Subject: Re: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
> >
> > And what about
> >
> > imminent
> > eminent
> > immanent
> >
> > Lord knw that most American's haven't got a clue as to the difference
> > in meaning or pronunciation (esp. in California).
>




Previous by Author: RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
Next by Author: RE: using "Acrobat Tools"
Previous by Thread: RE: Insure vs Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?
Next by Thread: RE: Insure vs. Ensure, was Re: Should we hire this guy?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads