TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Structure vs. Substance (long) From:Michele Davis <mdavis -at- bitstream -dot- net> To:"Jason A. Czekalski" <topsidefarm -at- mva -dot- net> Date:Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:29:20 -0500
My $100 worth. I have done pro se law for years. Suing people and winning.
Unfortunately I have the disadvantage of being smart. I got to the local U. law
library are do my research and then sue. Whop!
"Jason A. Czekalski" wrote:
> Andrew Plato wrote:
> Andrew, you're actually getting close. With both lawyers and doctors,
> their learning centers on THEORY! Their education is dominated with
> theory. Only later do they actually start to apply it to the known facts
> of a case.
> I'll start with lawyers. No law student ever puts a great amount of time
> into learning individual laws. Why bother? Those laws will change before
> he or she graduates, often quite dramatically. No, they learn huge
> amounts of theory and procedure. What they are learning is how to apply
> broad legal theory to specific cases, and to do the research to back up
> that case.