TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:PageMaker vs FrameMaker Comparison From:Bonita White <bwhite -at- youcentric -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:54:53 -0400
Good morning (afternoon, evening) All,
I have to try to convince my new supervisor--I just moved from a one
woman shop where I could order almost anything without question, to
being part of a department where I have to justify why I want to use a
particular software. So I need as many reasons as possible why I need
to purchase FrameMaker instead of using PageMaker for the manual.
Just a little background: The manual is going to be at least 250-300
pages; it will need to be translated into at least one other language
immediately, more later; it will need to be modular because I will have
to customize it to match EACH clients software; and no one here,
including me, has ever put together a document in PageMaker that was
more than about 100 pages in length.
Any and all reasons as to why Frame would be the better package to
use--I think so, but then I am completely biased toward Frame--would