Re: FWD: Anonymous tip about Frame futures

Subject: Re: FWD: Anonymous tip about Frame futures
From: Barry Kieffer <bkieffer -at- ims -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:05:42 -0700 (PDT)

"Psssst, hey buddy, when you post this to TECHWR-L don't mention that I am the
Adobe MARCOM manager, OK..."

> My source had been told to keep
> things quiet at the moment and no details of changes etc. were
> forthcoming. However, he saw no real need for the excessive secrecy and
> felt that users needed to know that it was going to continue and not be
> phased out, certainly not for some time.

"Ok buddy, and so that not everybody moves to Interleaf with XML, BladeRunner,
QuickSilver, or some new M$ product, post that Adobe will also really embrace
XML, OK pal?"

> One thing that was mentioned
> (possibly a slip of the tongue) was that there were no real competitors to
> Frame and that Frame with XML would be the main large doc tool in the
> future.

"And buddy, make sure that you tell them TECHWR-L's that there is NO real
competition to Frame with XML. We need to get them TECHWR-L'ers drooling over
the prospect that Frame is still king. OK pal?, here is your $50."

Previous by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question
Next by Author: RE: Have you seen the news about Corel and MS
Previous by Thread: FWD: Anonymous tip about Frame futures
Next by Thread: Re: FWD: Anonymous tip about Frame futures

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads