Re: ballot usability

Subject: Re: ballot usability
From: "David Berg" <dberg -at- dmpnet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:41:27 -0600

Just to show that accuracy can be a relative thing, consider the paper from
Lebanon that published an apology for declaring Gore as the winner. The
editor of the paper said;

``We are used to a deep-rooted Arab tradition of democracy where results are
first declared, then elections are conducted and votes brought in to affirm

I'll have to ponder what implications that sort of logic could potentially
have for TWs based in Lebanon and the documentation they produce. (BIG <g>)

David Berg

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: ballot usability
Next by Author: Re: Are Zip drives obsolete?
Previous by Thread: Re: ballot usability
Next by Thread: RE: ballot usability

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads