## Terminology quibble (was: Real value ...)

Subject: Terminology quibble (was: Real value ...)
From: Sandy Harris <sandy -at- storm -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 17:26:19 -0500

Bruce Byfield wrote:

> From where I sit (in the middle, with old eggs being thrown at me
> from either side), both these positions seem to use a reductio ad
> absurdum argument. In other words, both Dan and Andrew are taking
> their arguments to ridiculous extremes.

That's not what "reductio ad absurdum" means.
It actually means a specific method of proof.

Assume that what you want to prove is false.
Using the assumption, prove a contradiction or absurdity.
Since the result is obviously wrong, one of the premises must be.
Therefore what you wanted to prove is true.

For example, to prove no even number except two is prime.

Assume such a number exists.
Since it is even, it is by definition divisible by two.
Since it is prime, it is by definition divisible only by itself and one.
Since it is not two by our assumption, this is a contradiction.
Hence no number satisfying our assumption exists.
QED.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY.
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more
http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Real value (was implementing single-source) (Long)
Next by Author: Re: ADMIN: FYI