RE: "Chapter" vs "Appendix"

Subject: RE: "Chapter" vs "Appendix"
From: Barb Einarsen <barb -dot- einarsen -at- gnnettest -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:52:41 -0500

We use appendices for reference material (adapter specifications, a white
paper on the ATM protocol) or outdated material (people using outdated
hardware). All other information, including troubleshooting sections are
chapters. I have also toyed with the idea of removing appendices, but they
are handy for holding information that doesn't really 'belong' in the guide.

Barb Einarsen
Manager of Product Information Development
barb -dot- einarsen -at- gnnettest -dot- com
v: 905 948 7527

GN Nettest
f: 905 475 6524

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Framemaker Question ?
Next by Author: RE: robohelp 2000 (v9) stability on NT workstation
Previous by Thread: Re: "Chapter" vs "Appendix"
Next by Thread: Re: "Chapter" vs "Appendix"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads