TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:language and communication From:Damien Braniff <dbraniff -at- iss-dsp -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 13:41:04 +0000
Geoff Hart basically agreed with the conclusion I presented but not the
reasoning and gave several examples:
Science journals for complex information: I agree but we're down to
what Bruce was saying about levels. Science journals come in two
general flavours - one aimed at the populace at large and these are, I
would argue, fine examples of the TW art making science accessible to
the masses. The other type, is specifically aimed at readers of a
similar knowledge/experience etc as the writer. They DO explain complex
information but you often need something 'extra' to fully understand
them - knowledge of maths/physics etc.
Spatial information: Simple example but the more complex the
information the more we need to provide - 3rd door on the left, green
door, number 7, third left at the supermarket etc. And if you get into
complex spatial informtion like electrons orbiting a nucleus.... :)
With logic and analysis we're again talking levels. Currently the work
I'm doing involves fast Fourier transforms which I doubt anyone but an
engineer in the same field could make total sense out of.
As for emotions feelings.... I think the point being made was that what
you say isn't necessarily what you mean and often supporting evidence is
needed. If someone says 'I love you', the chances are you DON'T take it
at face value but subconsciously link it to how they treat you etc.
Almost nothing stands alone. If you read a good book you're inclined to
look favourably on one by the same author. On this list, there are
posters whose posts you read because of who's posting, not the thread,
because they're usually, informative/funny/ whatever. If you read a
technical manual/book and find that the instructions in a section are
wrong then you immediately treat the rest with caution.
Language is still the primary tool for most of us but we must realise
that it's only one of the tools available. And as to which tool we
use?... as is often the case in TW, it depends :)
As an aside, she had a quote from Terry Pratchett's 'Equal Rites' about
a tribe that always told the truth. This lead to problems dealing wiht
other races and they worked at telling lies until each village had a
Liar whose job it was to deal with outsiders - a position of great
esteem. Other races however thought they migh have adopted a more
suitable title like politician, diplomat, PR office..... :)
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.