TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
anonfwd -at- raycomm -dot- com wrote:
> Can anyone give me some pointers about choosing a recruiter - what should
> I look for/avoid? Also, can anyone recommend a recruiter in the Seattle
I've been in contact with 6 to 8 recruiters in the past five years,
so I have definite opinions about what to look for (but, then again,
when don't I?):
- The recruiters who have been most active on my behalf are
generally from smaller firms. Contrary to expectations, small does
not necessarily mean lacking in contacts. For example, IBM in Canada
has a list of recruiters that it prefers to use, and the list
includes a couple of local recruiters.
- It's usually a bad sign if the first thing that the company does
is ask you to fill out a long form, especially one that is about
computer technology in general, rather than about technical writing
- It's usually a good sign if the first thing that the company does
is conduct a general interview with you asking about your career
ambitions. If this interview takes place at a large firm, then it
may be an exception to my first point.
- Good recruiters:
* work hard to make both you and the company happy with
arrangements. They're honest brokers
* usually take you in hand from the bottom up, discussing how to
best present you to the company, and, even suggesting how to make
the best impression with the particular person who will be
* are honest about your chances, especially if a position is one
that you don't have all the qualifications for.
* follow up once you take the job, including visiting you on-site.
- Bad recruiters:
* are mostly concerned about their profit. They don't care whether
you are a good fit for the company, or the other way around.
* don't work with you to help you develop your presentation to the
* always pump each job as if you're the lead candidate, and submit
your resume for anything even remotely connected to your expertise.
* are hard to find after you land a job.
Bruce Byfield, Outlaw Communications
Contributing Editor, Maximum Linux
604.421.7189 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com
"This is the hour when the city turns blue,
This is the time of the lost and found,
They've loosed the nutters in the Underground,
Everything's far and nothing is true."
- Oysterband, "The Lost and Found"
Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more http://www.SolutionsEvents.com or 800-448-4230
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.