Re: farther and further

Subject: Re: farther and further
From: Robert Smith <robert -at- smith -dot- bc -dot- ca>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:36:14 -0800

>Reply-To: Mike <techmail_mike -at- yahoo -dot- com>
>Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:41:09 -0800 (PST)
>>Looked for this one in MoS, but didn't find anything.

Fowler's Modern English Usage says (and I'm excerpting):

"... that farther is not common except where distance is in question, and
that further has gained a virtual monopoly in the sense of moreover, both
alone and in the compund furthermore."

OTOH, Fowler's was first published in 1926 (by Oxford University Press) and
only revised in 1965. The niceties of usage may have changed (what hasn't?)
since then.


Robert Smith--Freelance Writer
"Live to ride--write to live"

Develop HTML-based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver! (STC Discount.)
**NEW DATE/LOCATION!** January 16-17, 2001, New York, NY. or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by SOLUTIONS, Conferences and Seminars for Communicators
Publications Management Clinic, TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, and more or 800-448-4230

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Slightly OT: Date Range Formatting
Next by Author: Re: The Origins of Techwriting (WAS:Re: Techwr-1 polls)
Previous by Thread: Re: farther and further
Next by Thread: FrameMaker on Linux

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads