RE: why marcomm should have a technical review

Subject: RE: why marcomm should have a technical review
From: Sanjay Srikonda <SSrikonda -at- invlink -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:22:26 -0500

Is this like the whole doco thing again?

-----Original Message-----
From: Victoria Camgros [mailto:vcamgros -at- persistence -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Sanjay Srikonda; TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: why marcomm should have a technical review


At 12:18 PM 1/30/01 -0500, Sanjay Srikonda wrote:
>what is marcomm? as a TW, i figure I'm paid to ask those questions I don't
>recognize the terminology.

Apologies. MARketing COMMunications.
<snip>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17)
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area.
http://www.pdfconference.com or toll-free 877/278-2131.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: why marcomm should have a technical review
Next by Author: RE: Robohelp/Word question
Previous by Thread: RE: why marcomm should have a technical review
Next by Thread: Visual Source Safe 6.0


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads