TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Anyhow, I'm now going to vent similar frustrations
> about technical knowledge tests.
> 1) They don't measure aptitude. Just because someone
> doesn't know what reciprocal compensation or a FAT
> table is doesn't mean they can't write about it.
If the person is good at learning about technology to the required degree,
then previous knowledge of the particular topic (e.g., a FAT table) is not a
requirement (assuming that there are SMEs around who can explain the topic
and have the time to do so).
But some people don't fully understand the technology when it is explained
(perhaps they don't know what questions to ask of someone who does not
explain well) and it shows in their writing. I have had to re-write
documents written by such people; even if the document has no factual
errors, it may be missing steps, not explain things in sufficient detail,
and is sometimes filled with meaningless fluff (e.g., on every screen with a
"delete" button, writing: click the "delete" button to delete a record).
In a company that has the resources to provide adequate training on the
technical issues, a technical test might not be necessary, but if the
company needs people with the existing knowledge, then I don't see the
problem with technical testing. The alternative, is to test whether the
person CAN write about the technical topic without pre-existing knowledge,
which would be a technical writing test using that topic.
IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
CALL FOR PAPERS OPEN UNTIL MARCH 15. http://ieeepcs.org/2001/
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.