RE: Acronyms

Subject: RE: Acronyms
From: Mike Stockman <stockman -at- jagunet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 14:24:30 -0500

At 12:46 PM 3/13/2001 -0600, Roy Jacobsen wrote:

I think the point is why do we find it necessary to make the distinction
between a plain expert and a subject-matter expert?

I've managed to have many years of successful technical writing without ever meeting or talking to anyone called an "SME." The only place I've even encountered that acronym has been on this list. In the 10+ companies I've worked or contracted for, I've often consulted the developers, project managers, and designers, and it's all been very useful without a single SME in sight.

Of course, I've always managed to work for smaller companies. I think that companies generate acronyms in direct proportion to the number of employees they have, but that's just my personal theory.

Good luck, and remember: if an acronym doesn't add convenience or understanding, why use it?



Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**New Dates!!** San Francisco (Apr 16-17), San Jose (Mar 29-30) or 800-646-9989.

IPCC 01, the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
October 24-27, 2001 at historic La Fonda in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: What to say when figures appear as though they "don't add up"--bu t do
Next by Author: Re: Saving Word to ASCII
Previous by Thread: RE: Acronyms
Next by Thread: RE: Acronyms

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads