Re: RE: Not again: certification

Subject: Re: RE: Not again: certification
From: "Scott Holstad" <SHolstad -at- ci -dot- knoxville -dot- tn -dot- us>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:53:37 -0400

Hi Lurker_Writer,

I actually agree with your points; I think they're valid. I'm not certain a tech writing certificate would be all that useful, and I'm not sure I would even support trying to create one. That said, the point I attempted to make was merely that, of any organization out there, the STC IMHO is in the best position to coordinate the creation of a certificate program. So, I'm not arguing pro-certificate; rather, I'm arguing pro-STC as they seem to have the most resources of any entity around for such an endeavor.



Scott C. Holstad
Technical Writer
City of Knoxville
sholstad -at- ci -dot- knoxville -dot- tn -dot- us

>>> "Lurker writer" <lurker_writer -at- hotmail -dot- com> 04/18 10:34 AM >>>

The bigger questions are:
What value would certification bring to the certification holder?
Will it provide a better opportunity for promotion and advancement? Will it
result in higher salaries or hourly rates?
Will it mean anything next time the company downsizes?
What kind of certification: a generic "certified technical writer"? What
does that mean and what good will that do?
How long will the certification be valid? One year? Five years?
How could a certification exam possibly cover every industry or field?
What are individual motives for wanting a "certified technical writer"
Certain states and professions have stringent certification requirements
(law, medicine, engineering) to protect the public from harm. Why would the
technical writing profession need certification?

Some research has already been mentioned that a generic designation has no
effect on hiring or promotion decisions, no matter who runs the
certification process. I have to agree with a previous posting that specific
process or product certifications have the potential for more value than
anything the STC could come up with.

I think that drawing the correlation between the STC being the largest tech
comm organization in the field with its capability to run a bona fide
certification process is a stretch. One reason they haven't bothered with
the idea is because everytime the topic comes up, the membership feedback is
overwhelmingly in favor of NOT pursuing the issue.



*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: RE: Not again: certification
Next by Author: Re: Not again: certification?
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: Not again: certification
Next by Thread: Re: Not again: Certification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads