RE: Not again: certification

Subject: RE: Not again: certification
From: david -dot- locke -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:30:15 -0500

Bryan said:

>In the case of doctors, there is a recognized, authoritative governing body
>that licenses them. STC has no clear right to declare themselves as such.

Actually, when the matter of political lobbying came up when the IRS changed
the tax code to make the 1099 contracting provisions of the tax code
stricter under the Regan administration reforms, the STC defined itself as a
strictly educational non-profit. As such it was and still is precluded from
lobbying state governments for the regulatory control to enforce license
restrictions like the AMA and ABA. Even with certification, the STC will
never be able to have the right to authoritatively govern its members.

It is bad enough that the evangelize the career while there members have no
intention of hiring anyone just entering this field.



*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Big Brother is watching?(veering slightly OT)
Next by Author: RE: RE: Not again: certification
Previous by Thread: Re: Not again: Certification
Next by Thread: RE: RE: Not again: certification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads