Re: FW: Top 5 dumb comments Tech Writers r

Subject: Re: FW: Top 5 dumb comments Tech Writers r
From: Janice Gelb <janiceg -at- marvin -dot- eng -dot- sun -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:09:35 -0700 (PDT)

In article 1 -at- si05 -dot- rsvl -dot- unisys -dot- com, no-spam -at- null -dot- dev (Rodney Copeland) writes:
>1) ?
>2) NO!
>3) Wrong!!!
>4) Need more here
>5) Is this right?

This is precisely the reason that I try to push using a
database for technical review comments (and gave a paper
on this at STC a couple of years ago). Reviewers are
less likely to write such inane things in a database
than they are if they're just scribbling on the side
of a page.


*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available 4/30/01 at or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 Conference East,
June 4-6, Baltimore, MD. Now covering Acrobat 5. Early registration deadline
April 27.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: Making them read the documentation
Next by Author: STC: Baseball Ticket Available
Previous by Thread: RE: Word to PDF
Next by Thread: RE: FW: Top 5 dumb comments Tech Writers r

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads