RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)

Subject: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)
From: "Douglas S. Bailey (AL)" <dbailey -at- commandalkon -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:57:02 -0500

> As much as it might hurt our egos, in the eyes of management
> an employee is an employee, and your refusing to use
> FrontPage when that's a part of your job description

Which leads me to ask: has anyone on this list refused to use a tool
required by the employer? To put it another way, does anyone here have such
a huge ego as to dictate to the hand that feeds him just what he will or
won't accept? This is a nice horse to beat, but if we're all members of the
choir then there's not much life in the horse (if I might mix a few



A landmark hotel, one of America's most beautiful cities, and
three and a half days of immersion in the state of the art:
IPCC 01, Oct. 24-27 in Santa Fe.

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: +++

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors): From: bryan . westbrook

Previous by Author: RE: Archimedes Socrates, ace tech writer, wins another one
Next by Author: RE: Baiting for the single source rant
Previous by Thread: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)
Next by Thread: RE: Diverse Tools (was HTML editors)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads