Re[2]: Fuzzy images - Vent

Subject: Re[2]: Fuzzy images - Vent
From: CHRISTINE ANAMEIER <CANAMEIE -at- email -dot- usps -dot- gov>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:20:36 -0400

Regarding PDF creation, John Posada wrote:
> The PDF looks good enough for 99% of the needed of the
> average writer and average user. . .
> Well-meaning but clueless writers think that if default
> settings gave acceptable settings, "tweaking" the settings
> will give something better, even though they wouldn't know
> what better if it smacked them between the eyes.

Ugh! John, tell me I'm misunderstanding your point: it sounds to me
like you're suggesting we all sink to the level of the "average"
writer--i.e., since the "average" writer is content to put out docs
with blurry, illegible screenshots and doesn't know squat about
compression methods, we should all just stop fussing about our
Distiller settings. Call me a perfectionist, but I want my documents
to look better than that. I don't want to be an "average" tech writer.

I researched the graphics and compression issues on the web and
educated myself, and the results are much more than 1% better. I'm not
suggesting that every other writer has to reinvent the wheel. A good
Techwr-L archive search will turn up detailed instructions posted by
the PDF mavens among us.


Planning to attend IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe? Sign up by
October 3 and get a substantial discount! Program information,
online registration, and more on

+++ Miramo -- Database/XML publishing automation. See us at +++
+++ Seybold SFO, Sept. 25-27, in the Adobe Partners Pavilion +++
+++ More info: +++

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Don't you love farce? CORRECTION
Next by Author: Re[4]: Fuzzy images - Vent
Previous by Thread: RE: Fuzzy images - Vent
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Fuzzy images - Vent

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads