RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette

Subject: RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette
From: bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:54:14 -0500

As I've heard it explained, it also means that employers to not have to deal directly with unions, though companies do because they are forced to do so for fear that the unions will strike against their branches in other states.

As for this issue of rights, consider this: in a right to work state an employer is not required to keep paying a bad employee any longer than that employer chooses to do so. For the workers, it means we don't have to stay at a job we hate. That's protecting someone's rights.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tracy Boyington [mailto:tracy_boyington -at- okcareertech -dot- org]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette

I wonder if this refers to unions... Oklahoma recently passed a "right to work" law which may be similar.

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Section 508
Next by Author: RE: layoff stories
Previous by Thread: RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette
Next by Thread: RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads