RE: layoff stories

Subject: RE: layoff stories
From: bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:07:20 -0500

The previous employer I mentioned in a couple posts yesterday seemed to save the termination of problem employees for sacrificial lambs in layoffs that were dictated from higher up the chain. It saves the company from any legal challenges that might have come of a termination with cause and saves the team from losing a valuable member when management comes around with an arbitrary number that does not take attrition into consideration.

-----Original Message-----
From: aschiff -at- factset -dot- com [mailto:aschiff -at- factset -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: layoff stories

In response to the sentiment re: "cutting dead wood and calling it a
layoff" -- I can see both sides on this issue. On the one hand, it is
unfair to fire someone for performance reasons and call it a layoff. Not

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Layoff logistics and etiquette
Next by Author: RE: Section 508
Previous by Thread: Re: layoff stories
Next by Thread: Popups From Screenshots in Framemaker/WebWorks?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads