RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?

Subject: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
From: "Gilger.John" <JGilger -at- acresgaming -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:33:32 -0700

I think you've got your nose out of joint for no reason.

Who cares what title is given to a good proof-reader? It sounds like
your "uppers" have the right idea when they want someone who is
independent of the doc production process doing the final proof read.

I would rather have our department's executive assistant catch one of my
bloopers than hear about it from one of our customers.

John Gilger
Senior Technical Writer
Acres Gaming, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com [mailto:TDean -at- envirosys -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 01:00 PM
Subject: Secretary Proofing Manuals?


I checked the Archives, but I didn't find much on the subject directly.

Currently, our company is re-structuring. The technical writers from
different groups in our company go together and agreed on review
procedure/document process for all of us to follow as a technical
group. This has never happen before - in our company, the Windows tech
writers did one thing, and the Unix tech writers did another.

I am very upset and insulted because the "uppers" insist on the
assistant proofing all of our manuals before they go out to our
In fact, we have to start including her in our style meetings as well.
Am I
just being egotistical? Does anyone else have a similar scenario?

The executive assistant doesn't have any control over the software so
should she have any control over the manuals? They are products just as

Tina Dean

Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Programs for Writing
Next by Author: RE: Trolling a little deeper with XML
Previous by Thread: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Next by Thread: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads