RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?

Subject: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
From: quills -at- airmail -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:24:42 -0500

Scott wrote:
Unless there is a history of your manuals not being well proofed, it
is unusual.

Ok, even then it is unusual.

walden writes:
It is not unusual. It is a name game. Tech writers should be used to this.
What is in a title? We wrangle over titles as much or more than anyone. It
sounds to me like you have a copyeditor being paid for by the company.
Calling it proofreading by an AA doesn't make it any less. I would love to
have a copyeditor on staff. Instead I hired a writer with copyediting
background and when deadlines aren't too tight, I can use him as a
copyeditor. You have a great situation. Don't blow it.

What is in a name. Pardon me, but why does a manager/director/vice-president consider the title important. Titles are important. With titles other things are associated. Money, power, authority, responsibility.

The name of a thing IS important.

In many offices, the admin assistant is the power. He or she gets things
done. Often, AA's are very well paid and very educated/intelligent/etc. We
have an AA that I am grooming for this very purpose. She is underused at
the moment, so in her spare time, she learned Framemaker and I am going to
start giving her assignments.

Tina said that the exec assistant is "very bogged down." Another VERY big reason why this work assignment is not a good idea.


I am amazed at the comments that are trying to subvert her situation, or
belittle her power. What's up with that? Check the archives. These are
some of the usual complaints about marginalizing our own positions.

Yes, it appears to be similar. Except her mission is support of her executive boss, not meeting the deadlines of the tech writers.

This situation can be fraught with pitfalls. If she was under utilized it would be good to have her help. That is evidently not the case. She has approval power. Why? Why does an admin, politically powerful or not, have approval over product?

Does this not seem like it is out of the realm of lines of authority? Outside the lines of responsibility? Outside the realm of competency?

walden

BTW: I think good copyeditors bring in equal or more money than typical
tech writers.


Scott

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day. For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?: From: walden miller

Previous by Author: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Next by Author: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Previous by Thread: RE: Secretary Proofing Manuals?
Next by Thread: Re: Secretary Proofing Manuals?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads