Re: Misunderstanding XML

Subject: Re: Misunderstanding XML
From: quills -at- airmail -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:52:16 -0600

At 3:04 PM -0800 11/1/01, Rick Kirkham wrote:

"Chris Knight" wrote...

But an XML tool doesn't work like that, nor is its supposed to. It does not
suppress the XML tags, nor does it do much of anything to the presentation
of what comes between the tags. That's not the idea of an XML tool.

An XML tool is an application that primarily does two things (1) makes the
tags easy to distinguish from the content, usually by giving them a
different color or indentation from the content, and (2) makes it easy to
insert tags with a few clicks, so that they don't have to be manually typed.
It may or may not also include other features, such as the ability to verify
that a document conforms to the XML language it is intended to use.
(Remember XML is a family of languages.)

Very true, but the tools that the comments were speaking about were those that provided formatting and viewing of the structure of an XML file.

The crux of XML is that it is structured. The structure in a particular instance, governed by a specific DTD or schema is always the same if it is valid. There are not many tools that provide a complete suite to address all of those concerns.

There are some, like Extensibility that do provide those tools. There are some, like FrameMaker + SGML that have always provided the capability to produce XML in well-formed and valid format.

There are some, like Microsoft Word, that trumpet XML as a capability, but do not explain what they mean. And, considering how many people use Word, I suspect that any XML output from their efforts would not be, or even intended to be valid. It would be well-formed, but that simply meets the criteria for HTML.

XML is not understood by a large population of technical writers, managers, and others. XML is a buzz word to most.

XML has one major draw back at this point, and that is the delivery system. Until that is taken care of we are at the same point we were at in 1994 when I first got on the internet. There wasn't a lot of HTML pages out there, most of the sites were accessed through telnet, FTP, gopher, etc.

Scott

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Be a published author! iUniverse gives you: a high-quality paperback, a
custom cover design, and distribution to 25,00 retailers. Join our almost
10,000 published authors today. http://www.iuniverse.com/publish/default.asp

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Misunderstanding XML: From: Rick Kirkham

Previous by Author: RE: More Unions
Next by Author: RE: Strange Interview Practices?
Previous by Thread: Misunderstanding XML
Next by Thread: Re: Misunderstanding XML


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads