RE: Quality of source material from Development

Subject: RE: Quality of source material from Development
From: "Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:43:22 -0000

Suzi Magill wrote: Being a power user on the product should also be

This is tricky to make mandatory, when frequently you are documenting in
parallel with the development of the product. At least, that's always been
my experience... I'd love to work someplace where they finished the product
with a deadline that left plenty of time to get the documentation done! <g>

Jane Carnall
Most technical writers make their living describing the smile on the face of
a black cat in a dark room in a house that will be built next week.


E-mail is an informal method of communication and may be subject to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment for which Digital Bridges Ltd will accept no liability. Therefore, it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information contained on e-mail without obtaining written confirmation.

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.


Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for?

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Quality of source material from Development: From: Suzi Magill

Previous by Author: RE: Quality of source material from Development
Next by Author: RE: no degree equals demotion
Previous by Thread: RE: Quality of source material from Development
Next by Thread: Re: Quality of source material from Development

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads