RE: Got Process?

Subject: RE: Got Process?
From: Andrew Plato <intrepid_es -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:07:33 -0800 (PST)

--- Steve Hudson <cruddy -at- optushome -dot- com -dot- au> wrote:

> I am extremely organised and he needs not worry about process management
> because its so simple and effective. So our lack of documentation is not
> a
> real issue. I am not even going to go near my writing ability, lets just
> say
> I produce highly effective documentation in a damn sight less time than
> a
> lot of other folks I have worked with. When its prod time, its prod
> time,
> and you lot don't hear so much from me.

Is this an argument or the Steve Hudson Story? Reminds me of the Biff
Tannen story.

> Matter of fact, these posts are cutting close to my heart at the moment
> because I am buried in process. I've changed my entire concept of my
> architecture <winces at misplaced word> and I want everything to be
> easily
> maintained and expandable. So its a huge amount of work at the moment,
> but
> already the added flexbility is proving to be a bonus.

Work harder, not smarter.

> Due to the nature of my dev machine, I do my doco at home, and the
> templates
> at work. If you are familiar with Sun Tsu's Art of War, I am on my
> grounds
> of contention and must cross or flounder.

Could you please tell me when we're going to get to a point here?

> > Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong.
> > My posts encourage writers to focus on their core function: writing.
> We will have to agree to disagree. I know I could goto the archives and
> get
> the quotes I need, but its a waste of time. I have an MVP award waiting
> elsewhere to claim.

Are we talking about anything related to process now or are you just
marketing your abilities?

> > And nobody cares to watch you fondle your tool.
> We want to see what you can do with those tools. Tool.
> A) Thats funny, several hundred people now fondle my tool daily after
> requesting it.
> B) I called you silly as you were raising silly red herrings. A number
> of
> offlist emails agreed with me on this point. I am not acting like a
> tool, so
> I am not particularly impressed with your turn of phrase.

So now were talking about me?

Are we ever going to discuss a technical communications concept here or do
you just want to have a pissing match over my language?

> TGIF and I don't have to work with you. Back to my 16 hour day.

When are they installing your bronze bust?

I think its time to end this thread. You've sent us off into non-technical
comm issues.

Andrew Plato

Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!

RoboHelp 2002 is now available! Get the very latest in Help functionality to
create superior Help systems. Special competitive upgrade pricing and other
pricing offers are in effect! Call today! Call now (800-455-5132) or visit

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Withheld Payments
Next by Author: Re: what is process
Previous by Thread: RE: Got Process?
Next by Thread: RE: Got Process?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads