RE: Got Process?

Subject: RE: Got Process?
From: "Steve Hudson" <cruddy -at- optushome -dot- com -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 04:43:54 +1100

Gee, that's funny, all I am talking about is tech comms. Proofing,
copy-editing, development work... welcome to my twit bin at last Andrew. I
have had nothing but flame bait from you, and you really do have some
peculiar ideas I no longer need to put up with. You are way wrong, and just
don't want to admit it.

Your job is to create dox and walk away from them. You don't have to nurse
the same dox along every day like most of the rest of us do. Your points are
irrelevant to most of us.


Steve Hudson, Word Heretic
Word help and tools: heretic -at- tdfa -dot- com

Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for?

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Got Process?: From: Andrew Plato

Previous by Author: RE: Got Process?
Next by Author: RE: Nesting Concepts (process vs. procedure)
Previous by Thread: RE: Got Process?
Next by Thread: RE: Got Process?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads