Word and Numbering

Subject: Word and Numbering
From: Stephen Hayhurst <SHayhurs -at- starbucks -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:15:11 -0800

Okay you people who think Word walks on water, I have a problem for you to
solve for me if you would.

I'm building a procedural template for the client. Micro$oft's definition of
numbering:

1.
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1.1.
1.1.1.1.1.
...

IS NOT usable numbering. Based on research done by a co-worker's consulting
firm, we've had great success using the following five level number
structure:

1.
1.1.
1.1.1.
A.
1.

This is the structure we want to incorporate into our templates in Word.
FrameMaker works fine, but I don't have that luxury here (yet).

Presently, I can do this manually as most of the procedures will not be that
long. However, I have had other clients whose have needed to be able to do
this with more detailed procedural content.

TIA


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you know you can get RoboHelp certified?
To learn how, visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr. Be sure to also check out
our special pricing offers and promotions for RoboHelp 2002.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: Extra's [sic] Slip...a follow-up
Next by Author: 90% doc accuracy results in Company Losses (was When is it right to be wrong?)
Previous by Thread: Re: Source/Version Document Control
Next by Thread: Re: Word and Numbering


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads