RE: Dangling Modifiers

Subject: RE: Dangling Modifiers
From: Bill Burns <bill_burns -at- lionbridge -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:38:51 -0700

Hi, Ellen.

> Every time our VP edits my docs (we are a small company, I take whatever
> edits I can get!) he marks up dangling modifiers. My thought on the
> subject,
> which we disucss every time, is that it makes for awkward sentence
> constructions that do not mirror the way people talk. This in turn makes
> the
> documentation hard to read, as you have to stop and think through the
> sentence.
If the examples are actually dangling modifiers, you should eliminate them.
However, it's possible that your VP is overgeneralizing a rule and
identifying legitimate subordinate clauses for dangling modifiers. Could you
provide some examples?

Bill Burns
Technical Communications Manager
Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.
12585 W. Explorer Dr., Suite 150
Boise, ID 83713
Phone: 208.321.4406
FAX: 208.321.4490
E-mail: bill_burns -at- lionbridge -dot- com

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Need help with a pompous engineer
Next by Author: RE: Benefits of FrameMaker
Previous by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads