Re: Dangling Modifiers

Subject: Re: Dangling Modifiers
From: "Firetail Documentation" <firetail_documentation -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:18:15 -0500

> James Kirkpatrick once wrote that the "rule" is a fallacy that dates back
> when all important writing was in Latin. In Latin, it is impossible to end
> sentence in a preposition. Therefore, when the Latin version was
> to English, the sentences did not end in a preposition.

Of course, to accept that a recommendation for English usage is invalid
simply because it's of foreign origin would also be to invalidate over half
the words in the language... Does it matter from where the grammar (or the
word) comes, if it's commonly accepted? This is how people have come to
expect a formal English sentence to be written, regardless of the
'ethnicity' of the concept.

Todd G. Sutherland
Firetail Documentation

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See and check it out.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


RE: Dangling Modifiers: From: Dana Worley
Re: Dangling Modifiers: From: Michael Feimster

Previous by Author: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Author: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Previous by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads