Re: Dangling Modifiers

Subject: Re: Dangling Modifiers
From: "Firetail Documentation" <firetail_documentation -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:09:07 -0500

> I am afraid I would have to vote for the correct usage. And, I don't
> think the argument that "it's not the way people talk", can be used.

I think Ellen is right. There's a time and place for casual usage:
fiction writing, letter writing, and actual conversation. But I think
technical writing, like essay writing, is supposed to be formal and
professional, and as nearly transparent to all speakers of English as
possible. If we relax the standard, local idiom and colloquialisms will
creep in and potentially confuse some readers. I don't think it's a bad
idea to give the reader enough credit to be able to negotiate a properly
forged English sentence. Our sentences should be short, clear, precise and
well grammared.

Todd G. Sutherland
Firetail Documentation

Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Dangling Modifiers: From: Dana Worley

Previous by Author: RE: Are you a writer?
Next by Author: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Previous by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers
Next by Thread: Re: Dangling Modifiers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads