Re: Redundancy - Necessary?

Subject: Re: Redundancy - Necessary?
From: kcronin -at- daleen -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:21:38 -0700

Redundancy is good.

Redundancy is good.

Seriously, I think your add-on explanation is helpful. There is no verb in
"Woobbly Factor Widgets only," and with a lengthy chain of potentially
unfamiliar words like that, the "only" can get lost.


- Keith Cronin

- Keith Cronin

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: No time to learn it all
Next by Author: Re: HOW TOs?
Previous by Thread: Re(2): Redundancy - Necessary?
Next by Thread: Redundancy - Necessary?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads