Minimalist approach to conceptual information (was: minimalist or low-level)?

Subject: Minimalist approach to conceptual information (was: minimalist or low-level)?
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 08:38:36 -0500

Maaike Groenewege wonders <<...does anyone here have an opinion (or even
better: research) about minimalistic approaches for *conceptual*
information? In theory, conceptual information should be related to a task,
but in practise, some types of information just don't fit.>>

I don't claim to be an expert on minimalism, but my understanding is that
you can boil down the philosophy (thereby producing a nourishing broth while
losing most of the meat) into a simple statement: "provide only the
information the user needs to accomplish the task". If the task is
understanding rather than doing, it seems to me that this statement still
applies perfectly well: provide only the information readers need to
understand the concept.

It's a tautology to say so, but if you provide everything your audience
needs, and nothing that they don't need, then by definition you've satisfied
their needs. The research question then becomes how to correctly identify
those needs, not whether minimalism is effective in communicating conceptual
information. That's a much more interesting and complex question, and it
doesn't matter what you call the approach.

John Carroll's work undoubtedly contains examples of successful minimalism,
and there have been many followup reviews of his work by other authors that
can provide good food for thought; the Journal of Computer Documentation
(May 1999) had a few reviews that were interesting. But the results of other
people's research are less relevant than whether you can figure out how to
apply the approach successfully to your own work.

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

"Science is built up of facts, as a house is built of stones; but an
accumulation of facts is no more science than a heap of stones is a
house"--Jules-Henri Poincarré

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now's a great time to buy RoboHelp! You'll get SnagIt screen capture
software and a $200 onsite training voucher FREE when you buy RoboHelp
Office or RoboHelp Enterprise. Hurry, this offer expires February 28, 2002. www.ehelp.com/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Minimalist or low-level?
Next by Author: Integrating Tech Pubs more closely with Engineering?
Previous by Thread: ADMIN: Rules reminder
Next by Thread: AW: Minimalist or low-level?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads