More explanation about coaching for improved performance

Subject: More explanation about coaching for improved performance
From: wordsync -at- swbell -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:26:17 -0700

Thank you to all who have responded so far. I want to clarify what I mean
about coaching for improved performance for those who have asked.

For each job there are desired competencies, some more strongly needed
than others. Say you need to be at stage 3 in technical knowledge, but
financial knowledge is okay at stage 1 (merely an pretend example). The
idea of coaching for improved performance is to develop the employee's
competencies in all areas, or even to help them grow their skills for a
future role. It also includes improved performance in those areas that are
found wanting during a performance review.

The following is my response to off-list questions:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've been involved in several corporations where coaching is part of the
management process, meaning that you have ongoing (usually monthly)
meetings with those you supervise--you coach them--and whoever supervises
you--he or she coaches you. It is also used to "develop" people, and I see
it as differing from mentoring since it arises from a management
relationship. Or maybe it just depends on one's definition of coaching
versus mentoring.

I asked the questions for several reasons. I have a very close friend
whose job is in jeopardy because of (in my opinion) an ineffective coach.
Also, since I have coached others, I am somewhat doubtful that just anyone
can be effective in that role. Last, I am reviewing a manuscript about
coaching, and it has caused me to seek the real-life experiences of others
who have been involved in coaching relationships on either side.

I know this subject is off-topic for the list, and I hesitated before
posting, particularly in light of recent list activity. However, in
discussions about resumes, hiring, processes, etc., this list has provided
a lot of thought-provoking responses. I appreciate your willingness to
respond to my topic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Again, thank you for considering the topic and responding.

Pat Glass
wordsync -at- swbell -dot- net
(working on my Web site--wordsync.biz--coming someday!)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check it out! Get some cool freebies when you buy RoboHelp! You'll receive
SnagIt screen capture software and a 10% discount voucher for RoboHelp
Consulting. This special offers expires March 29, 2002.
www.ehelp.com/techwr
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Is coaching for improved performance effective?
Next by Author: Re: Next Week's Techwr-l Poll?
Previous by Thread: Re: If you were going to learn...
Next by Thread: Work-arounds _ RE: Clearcase and Macs


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads