Question about ascending vs. descending order....?

Subject: Question about ascending vs. descending order....?
From: "Hart, Geoff" <Geoff-H -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:07:09 -0500

Susie Pearson wonders: <<An application sorts messages by date, the oldest
date is listed first, the newest date is listed last. Is this considered
'ascending'? The same application sorts names A-Z. Is this considered
'descending'?>>

"Ascending" is used to indicate movement from an early point in a series to
a later point. Since dates and alphabetical listings both have a
recognizable order (oldest to newest and A to Z, respectively), then
starting with the oldest date or the first letter of the alphabet makes it
clear the order is "ascending".

However, the fact that you had to ask the question, and that I had to think
about how to express my answer clearly, suggests the problem with this
approach: the terms "ascending" and "descending" don't relate directly to
the concept a nontechnical reader is grappling with, and thus, they're not
necessarily the best words for the job. What I mean is that the concepts are
more abstract than simpler terms that relate more directly to the terms
readers would choose: for dates, the concept is "sorting from oldest to
newest" (or vice versa), and for names, sorting "in alphabetical order" or
"in reverse alphabetical order" would likely be clearer. As neither is
significantly longer than "ascending" and "descending" order, why not use
them instead?

--Geoff Hart, FERIC, Pointe-Claire, Quebec
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca
"User's advocate" online monthly at
www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/usersadvocate.html

"When ideas fail, words come in very handy."--Goethe

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check it out! Get some cool freebies when you buy RoboHelp! You'll receive
SnagIt screen capture software and a 10% discount voucher for RoboHelp
Consulting. This special offers expires March 29, 2002.
www.ehelp.com/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Occupational hazard - carpal tunnel?
Next by Author: Now lone techwriter, startup?
Previous by Thread: Re: web animation
Next by Thread: TW angle to the Compuware/IBM conflict


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads