RE: tech writers in the public eye

Subject: RE: tech writers in the public eye
From: "Stevenson, Rebecca" <Rebecca -dot- Stevenson -at- workscape -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:21:53 -0500

Careful, Alex, a Fox exec might see this. If I see a show next year about valets who daydream, I'm blaming you.

Unless you're running for office, there's no reason to care what "the public" thinks. (Maybe not even then.)


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Silbajoris [mailto:alsilba -at- hotmail -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: tech writers in the public eye


But a technical writer? If the public thinks that anybody can write, then
what is the value added by a "tech" writer? What's the difference between
that and a "tech" valet parking attendant?

Or, what greater contrast than that between a guy who rules the universe,
and a guy who sits in a drab cubicle doing "nothing" all day?

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: on technical writers
Next by Author: Master Documents, with a side of Single Source Sauce
Previous by Thread: Re: tech writers in the public eye
Next by Thread: Ship Names In Tech Docs..

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads