RE: he/she redux

Subject: RE: he/she redux
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:20:22 -0500

"Jane Carnall" <jane -dot- carnall -at- digitalbridges -dot- com> wrote:

>The problem there (as I see it) is that with mothers of girls you still have
>the same problem of two identical pronouns referring to two different
>people. I envisage two solutions to this (one of which you have probably
>already thought of, one of which I bet you haven't).

Jane, these are all written in the second person (to the mother). The particular subject is breastfeeding technique, so the father is not addressed. All third person pronouns refer to the baby.

PC Magazine gives RoboHelp Office 2002 five stars - a perfect score!
"The ultimate developer's tool for designing help systems. A product
no professional help designer should be without." Check out RoboHelp at

Check out the TECHWR-L Site redesign!

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: he/she redux
Next by Author: RE: he/she redux
Previous by Thread: RE: he/she redux
Next by Thread: RE: he/she redux

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads